Skip to main content

Reading 00: Beyond the Board

I signed up for this class without knowing what exactly it was about. Maybe I'm just a masochist and enjoy the "reasonable workloads" pbui gives out, idk. I think at the end of the day though, I was drawn to this class because it was about the history of video games. Playing games has always been something I’m passionate about, whether it was the endless days of monopoly when I was a kid, or the thousands of hours I sunk into League of Legends when I was in High School. So to have this chance to learn more about the history of games, and discuss it with other people is something I’m looking forward to.

I think that board games and video games share a symbiotic relationship. Video games and board games have always drawn inspiration from one another. Board games are adapted to video games and more recently, board games have been created that are based on video games. Video games like Tabletop Simulator blur the boundary between the two genres and allow for interesting new interactions. The constant back and forth between video and board games has improved the quality of both.

Both retro and modern video games have drawn from board games in different ways. In the early days video games were a way to adapt popular titles into single player experiences. Baldur’s Gate was a wildly successful adaptation of the Dungeons and Dragons ruleset into a pc game. In more recent times, successful video games such as the X-COM (or is it just XCOM now?) reboot have been adapted into board games of their own. The trend here is that adapting board games to video games and vice-versa allows them to reach broader audiences then they otherwise would. Look no further than the recent surge of digital card games as proof of this trend, from Yu-Gi-Oh Duel Links to Gwent, to the biggest of them all Hearthstone, card games are coming back in a big way in a new digital form. By transitioning from traditional physical cards to a digital format, huge segments of the market have access to games they have never played before, forming new fans of the source material the games are based on.

This isn’t to say that video games are just cribbing all their ideas from board games for a quick buck. VR is an exciting area to watch when it comes to the future of gaming because itallows for a level of immersion that is difficult for either traditional video games or board games to achieve. There is enormous potential for exciting new ways of interacting with games that nobody has ever seen before. One of my favorite VR games right now is called Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes. The goal of the game is for the person wearing the VR headset to defuse a bomb. The only problem is that they have no idea how to. That job falls to the other players, who have a physical bomb defusal manual printed out. Their task is to guide the defuser through the process using only their verbal description of what the bomb looks like. It can lead to some very intense moments for everyone involved, which is pretty incredible considering the majority of the people playing can’t see the actual game at all!

Games like these are especially exciting because of how they manage to blend the virtual and physical aspects of gameplay into a single experience. In the future I’m hopeful that more developers will take advantage of these aspects of VR to craft truly unique gameplay experiences.

This blog has been a long and disjointed ramble through things I’ve noticed and that make me excited for the future of games in general, whether they be video games or board games. It’s hard to contain my enthusiasm about this subject as there’s just so much more to say than just one short blog post. But, to make a long story short and answer the original prompt, I think that board games and video games are permanently intertwined, the yin to the other’s yang. They are two sides of the same coin of gaming and each is made better by innovations of the other. The future of games looks great and I can’t wait to see what comes next.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 08: A Casino in Your Pocket

Mobile games are weird. Think of when you got your first smartphone or tablet (or an iPod Touch if you were like me and had parents who hated fun). I remember eagerly loading up my account with iTunes gift cards and gleefully buying whatever piqued my interest. I was curious so I looked up my download history on the App Store. Back then, games were short and my attention span even shorter. I filled page after page of my iPod's home screen with flash game clones and prototypical free to play titles. It was a simpler time. Angry Birds, Fruit Ninja, Cut the Rope, Jetpack Joyride, Tiny Wings, Flappy Bird...the list of 'classics' goes on and on. Absolute classics I tell you It's a little hard to trace, but I'd say around 2013-14, the App Store reached peak game saturation. As other parts of the device competed more for our storage space (read: phone cameras stopped sucking) it became much harder to get people into the App Store to download games. Obviously this di...

Reading 06: But Can it Run Crysis?

The transition from 2D graphics to 3D graphics was rough, ugly, and drawn out. Early 3D games that were praised for their cutting edge visuals seem painfully ugly by today's standards. The amount of polygons required to draw a realistic looking image was a daunting task for early consoles and it wasn't until the early 2000s with the PS2 and XBOX that 3D visuals would look like anything more than a mess of pointy blocks.  Original Tomb Raider was something else Today's modern graphics are the result of years of cutthroat competition between ATI (later AMD) and Nvidia. If it wasn't for the technological arms race these companies underwent, we wouldn't have computer graphics as we know them. That's not to say that just gaming that has benefitted from the explosion in power of graphics processors. With CUDA and other similar technologies the GPU is poised for rapid growth in areas it wasn't originally intended for. One of the more obvious places to lo...

Reading 11: Gaming in Society

Whenever a tragedy occurs, there will be people who are quick to deflect blame away from the obvious. In the case of mass shootings, the punching bag appears to be video games. Time and again we hear how the people committing these terrible acts play Call of Duty or Counter Strike. As far back as the Columbine massacre, people have accused video games of inciting these acts. To me this just seems like blatant ignorance. Instead of pointing out how a mass shooter owned GTA V, wouldn't it be better to examine his mental state? I guess what I'm trying to say is that even the demographic that most often commits these crimes also happens to buy video games does not mean the two events are at all related. It's disappointing that the media has chosen to demonize video games over non-existent problems when more serious issues do exist. For example, addiction is a very real problem in modern gaming. In reading 8, I discussed how mobile games often included blatant slot machi...